Volume 17, Issue 7
Scientific Report
Open Access

Analysis of the European baseline survey of norovirus in oysters

First published: 15 July 2019
Correspondence: E-mail address: amu@efsa.europa.eu
Requestor: European Commission
Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2015‐00764
Acknowledgements: EFSA wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Request for scientific and technical assistance on the baseline survey of Norovirus in oysters: Marc Aerts, Soizick Le Guyader, James Lowther, Micheal O'Mahony and Anne Thebault, and EFSA staff members: Alexandra Papanikolaou, Jane Richardson, Kenneth Mulligan, Doreen Russell, Frank Boelaert and José Cortiñas Abrahantes.
Approved: 1 July 2019
“This article was first published on the EFSA website.”
Amended: 01 October 2019

Abstract

The European Commission requested scientific technical assistance for the analysis of a European Union coordinated monitoring programme on the prevalence of norovirus in raw oysters. A total of 2,180 valid samples were taken from production areas and 2,129 from dispatch centres, taken over two consecutive years, ensuring the precision and the confidence desired in the estimation. The prevalence at production areas was estimated to be 34.5% (CI: 30.1–39.1%), while for batches from dispatch centres it was 10.8% (CI: 8.2–14.4%). The analyses show a strong seasonal effect, with higher contamination in the period November to April, as well as lower contamination for Class A areas than other classes. These associations were observed in both production areas and batches from dispatch centres. The results for both genogroups were above the respective limit of quantification (LOQ) in less than 10% of the samples taken. The simple substitution of not‐detected and positive samples below the LOQ, by half of the limit of detection and half of the LOQ, respectively, produced estimates of the proportion of samples above or equal to 300 copies per gram (cpg) comparable to the statistical model. The current bacteriological microbiological criteria applicable to live bivalve molluscs might be complemented by a norovirus criterion. The analyses of the substitution approach show that selection of a potential limit within a microbiological criterion close to or lower than the LOQ (for example, less than 300 cpg, given the current test used in this survey) would be difficult to apply. This survey only assessed thresholds from the perspective of the analytical capability and not that of human health risk.