Volume 13, Issue 11
Conclusion on Pesticide
Open Access

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance glyphosate

First published: 12 November 2015
Citations: 37
Approval date: 30 October 2015
Published date: 12 November 2015
Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2014‐00546, EFSA‐Q‐2014‐00546, EFSA‐Q‐2014‐00546, EFSA‐Q‐2015‐00279, EFSA‐Q‐2015‐00279, EFSA‐Q‐2015‐00279
On request from: European Commission

Abstract

The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State Germany, for the pesticide active substance glyphosate are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010 as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 380/2013. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of glyphosate as a herbicide on emerged annual, perennial and biennial weeds in all crops [crops including but not restricted to root and tuber vegetables, bulb vegetables, stem vegetables, field vegetables (fruiting vegetables, brassica vegetables, leaf vegetables and fresh herbs, legume vegetables), pulses, oil seeds, potatoes, cereals, and sugar‐ and fodder beet; orchard crops and vine, before planting fruit crops, ornamentals, trees, nursery plants etc.] and foliar spraying for desiccation in cereals and oilseeds (pre‐harvest). The reliable endpoints, concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. Following a second mandate from the European Commission to consider the findings from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) regarding the potential carcinogenicity of glyphosate or glyphosate‐containing plant protection products in the on‐going peer review of the active substance, EFSA concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans and the evidence does not support classification with regard to its carcinogenic potential according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 37

  • Dual lanthanide-probe based on coordination polymer networks for ratiometric detection of glyphosate in food samples, Food Chemistry, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126815, (126815), (2020).
  • PESTICIDES, Environmental Toxicants, 10.1002/9781119438922, (855-875), (2020).
  • Glyphosate and cancer: the importance of the whole picture, Pest Management Science, 10.1002/ps.5834, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Letter to the editor: Re: “Herbicide biomonitoring in agricultural workers in Valle del Mayo, Sonora Mexico” by Balderrama-Carmona et al. (2019) in Environ Sci Pollut Res Int (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07087-6), Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 10.1007/s11356-020-08388-x, (2020).
  • Glyphosate and AMPA levels in human urine samples and their correlation with food consumption: results of the cross-sectional KarMeN study in Germany, Archives of Toxicology, 10.1007/s00204-020-02704-7, (2020).
  • The Potential Effects of Recall Bias and Selection Bias on the Epidemiological Evidence for the Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate, Risk Analysis, 10.1111/risa.13440, 40, 4, (696-704), (2019).
  • Assessment of Glyphosate Induced Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance of Pathologies and Sperm Epimutations: Generational Toxicology, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-019-42860-0, 9, 1, (2019).
  • How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?, Environmental Sciences Europe, 10.1186/s12302-018-0184-7, 31, 1, (2019).
  • Honeybee and consumer’s exposure and risk characterisation to glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) and its degradation product (AMPA): residues in beebread, wax, and honey, Science of The Total Environment, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135312, (135312), (2019).
  • Rapid and reliable detection of glyphosate in pome fruits, berries, pulses and cereals by flow injection – mass spectrometry, Food Chemistry, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125813, (125813), (2019).
  • Effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on soil animal trophic groups and associated ecosystem functioning in a northern agricultural field, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-019-44988-5, 9, 1, (2019).
  • On Giving Account and Taking Things into Account: The Case of Glyphosate, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3316949, (2019).
  • How Glyphosate Impairs Liver Condition in the Field Lizard Podarcis siculus (Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1810): Histological and Molecular Evidence , BioMed Research International, 10.1155/2019/4746283, 2019, (1-13), (2019).
  • Ecotoxicology of Glyphosate-Based Herbicides on Aquatic Environment, Organic Pollutants [Working Title], 10.5772/intechopen.73718, (2019).
  • Glyphosate in yam from Ghana, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, 10.1080/19393210.2019.1609098, (1-5), (2019).
  • Examining German Media Coverage of the Re-Evaluation of Glyphosate, Sustainability, 10.3390/su11071910, 11, 7, (1910), (2019).
  • Detection of glyphosate and its metabolites in food of animal origin based on ion-chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (IC-HRMS), Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 10.1080/19440049.2019.1583380, (1-9), (2019).
  • Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts: a pilot study using argumentation analysis, Journal of Risk Research, 10.1080/13669877.2018.1517378, (1-19), (2019).
  • The Introduction of Thousands of Tonnes of Glyphosate in the food Chain—An Evaluation of Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans, Foods, 10.3390/foods8120669, 8, 12, (669), (2019).
  • Montmorillonites Can Tightly Bind Glyphosate and Paraquat Reducing Toxin Exposures and Toxicity, ACS Omega, 10.1021/acsomega.9b02051, (2019).
  • Influence of cow-dung amendment on glyphosate mobility in soil, Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 10.1080/02772248.2019.1662018, (1-16), (2019).
  • Access to European Union Agencies: Usual Suspects or Balanced Interest Representation in Open and Closed Consultations?, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 10.1111/jcms.12991, 0, 0, (2019).
  • Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature, Pest Management Science, 10.1002/ps.5717, 0, 0, (2019).
  • Occurrence of glyphosate and AMPA residues in soy-based infant formula sold in Brazil, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 10.1080/19440049.2017.1419286, 35, 4, (724-731), (2018).
  • Comments for Mertens et al. (2018), Glyphosate, a chelating agent—relevant for ecological risk assessment?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 10.1007/s11356-018-2506-0, 25, 27, (27662-27663), (2018).
  • Evaluation of the impact of glyphosate and its residues in feed on animal health, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5283, 16, 5, (2018).
  • Review of the existing maximum residue levels for glyphosate according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5263, 16, 5, (2018).
  • Pesticides and public health: an analysis of the regulatory approach to assessing the carcinogenicity of glyphosate in the European Union, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 10.1136/jech-2017-209776, 72, 8, (668-672), (2018).
  • Glyphosate: A review of its global use, environmental impact, and potential health effects on humans and other species, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10.1007/s13412-018-0517-2, (2018).
  • Reply to the letter to the editor by Swarthout et al. (2018): Comments for Mertens et al. (2018), Glyphosate, a chelating agent—relevant for ecological risk assessment?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 10.1007/s11356-018-2440-1, (2018).
  • What is Information Relating to Emissions into the Environment?, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10.1017/err.2017.15, 8, 2, (453-460), (2017).
  • Scientific Opinion of the PPR Panel on the follow‐up of the findings of the External Scientific Report ‘Literature review of epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects’, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5007, 15, 10, (2017).
  • Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the potential endocrine disrupting properties of glyphosate, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4979, 15, 9, (2017).
  • The 2015 European Union report on pesticide residues in food, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4791, 15, 4, (2017).
  • A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214677, 46, sup1, (3-20), (2016).
  • The 2014 European Union Report on Pesticide Residues in Food, EFSA Journal, 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4611, 14, 10, (2016).
  • Glyphosate rodent carcinogenicity bioassay expert panel review, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214679, 46, sup1, (44-55), (2016).